Friday, February 8, 2008

A "Traitor" Justifies Her Obama Love

There's this utterly ridiculous and infuriating meme going around now coming from some of the more strident of Hillary supporters that Obama supporters are somehow acting and sounding sexist, both subtly and not so subtly. As if that's not enough, they're calling women who support Obama traitors to their gender. Can you believe this shit?

Anyway, former NARAL president Kate Michelman recently came out in favor of Obama (see this post) and has since faced charges of betrayal herself. She was on Hardball recently and resident knob Chris Matthews threw some inane questions at her which she didn't have the time to fully respond to. Here's her complete response in Salon.com. An excerpt:
What I really wanted to say to Chris Matthews
The women's movement is about free choice, self-determination and challenging a status quo that fails a lot of Americans, not just women. And it is not about going along. It's about transcending, about having the freedom to follow one's heart, about creating and pursuing new opportunities, and about the American dream being for all Americans.

Chris' gotcha-type question to me and the semi-criticism implicit in it -- that as a woman I have some biological obligation to unreservedly support whatever woman is running -- are exactly the sentiments I faced when I first started working for a woman's right to choose. If women who vote for men are traitors, then are men who vote for women also traitors? What about African-Americans who vote for whites? Or whites who vote for African-Americans?

Laying this guilt trip, this hypocrisy, on women -- saying that those women who don't vote for other women are turncoats -- is tantamount to saying that women who exercise independent thought haven't the right to do that either. Could there be a more anti-feminist contention?

No comments: